Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402957›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Extended susceptibility testing for refractory Helicobacter pylori infection: regional testing should guide antimicrobial decision making.

Maria Paroikaki, Harin Navalan, Scott J C Pallett, Nabeela Mughal, Frances Davies, Saleh A Alqahtani, Luke S P Moore

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Maria Paroikaki *Imperial College School of Medicine, Imperial College London South Kensington Campus, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Harin Navalan *Clinical Infection Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Scott J C PallettClinical Infection Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Nabeela MughalClinical Infection Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK.
Frances DaviesNorth West London Pathology, Fulham Palace Rd, London, W6 8RF, UK.
Saleh A AlqahtaniLiver, Digestive, and Lifestyle Health Research Section, and Organ Transplant, Centre of Excellence, King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Luke S P MooreClinical Infection Department, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, 369 Fulham Road, London, SW10 9NH, UK. l.moore@imperial.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHelicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is a Gram-negative bacterium and common cause of gastritis. Antimicrobial treatment typically involves two agents and is prescribed empirically however therapy can be complicated by drug allergies or previous, unsuccessful regimens. Recent data from Europe suggests rising resistance to commonly used agents but contemporary data relevant to UK populations, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic is limited. This study aimed to report susceptibility testing results in refractory cases of H. pylori infections to evaluate local resistance patterns, inform treatment strategies, and compare findings with data from the European Registry on H. pylori management.

methodsA retrospective multi-centre cohort study was conducted between September 2018 and September 2023 at North West London Pathology (London, UK), a central laboratory operating through a hub and spoke model, to assess extended antimicrobial susceptibilities in gastric biopsy samples from patients with refractory H. pylori infection. Antimicrobial susceptibilities were assessed using minimum inhibitory concentration methods as per contemporaneous European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. Results were compared with European data.

resultsA total of 193 individual isolates were identified. Mean resistance rates were low for tetracycline (2.3%) and amoxicillin (7.3%), moderately low for rifampicin (14.0%), moderate for levofloxacin (27.3%) and high for metronidazole (82.7%) and clarithromycin (75.5%) across the study period. Levofloxacin had a trend of increasing susceptibility (p = 0.10) and rifampicin of increasing resistance (p = 0.31) throughout the study. Resistance rates were significantly higher for the non-naïve North West London cohort compared with the European non-naïve cohort for metronidazole (p < 0.001), amoxicillin (p < 0.01), and clarithromycin (p = 0.02).

conclusionThese findings emphasize the necessity of tailored treatment approaches, informed by regional susceptibility patterns. As antimicrobial resistance continues to evolve a proactive and adaptive approach to treatment strategies remains paramount to effectively treat H. pylori infection and mitigate associated clinical and financial burdens. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsHelicobacter InfectionsHelicobacter pyloriAdultAgedAmoxicillinDrug Resistance, BacterialFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAmoxicillinAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistance [MeSH]Antimicrobial stewardship [MeSH]GastritisPeptic ulcer

Identifiers

PMID41402957
PMCPMC12821947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.