ArticlePilot and feasibility studies2025
Protocol for an unblinded randomised controlled feasibility trial of Piano Instruction for Adult Novices as Online Cognitive intervention (PIANO-Cog): a novel remote piano training programme for cognitive and motor functions in older age.
Article in Pilot and feasibility studies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAgeing is associated with a loss of fluid intelligence and motor functions which hamper independence and quality of life. Training in a musical instrument can improve fluid intelligence and executive function (EF) in older non-musicians but the neural correlates underpinning the benefits remain elusive. The primary aims of this study are to: i) test the acceptability of Piano Instruction for Adult Novices as Online Cognitive Intervention (PIANO-Cog), a novel bespoke 8-week self-guided piano training programme for adults over the age of 50 years; and ii) to test the feasibility (in terms of recruitment, retention and adherence) of a large scale RCT comparing PIANO-Cog to a passive control. Secondary aims of this study are: i) to investigate the effects of online piano training on fluid abilities, EF and motor function; ii) to investigate training-induced microstructural brain changes using ultra-strong gradient (300mT/m) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and iii) to investigate how the latter may be linked to cognitive improvements post-training.
methodA two-armed unblinded RCT will be conducted on 50 healthy non-musician adults over the age of 50. Participants will be randomised to a piano training (PT) or passive control group for 8 weeks, stratified for age and sex. PT participants will receive a training manual and 20-min video tutorials each week, and will practice 30 min, 5 days per week. Control participants will receive no intervention for the 8-week period. Cognitive testing and MRI of the brain will take place before and after the intervention. DISCUSSION: The primary aim of the trial is to determine the acceptability of PIANO-Cog as an online cognitive intervention for adults over 50 who are non-musicians, and the feasibility of conducting a large-scale RCT in terms of recruitment, retention and adherence. Self-guided music training programmes could provide a cost-effective method of maintaining or improving cognitive and motor functions that individuals can implement in their own homes. Secondary aims are regarding the investigation of positive transfer of piano training to EF and fluid abilities in ageing, and to provide evidence for the relationship between training-induced cognitive enhancements and underlying white and grey matter microstructural changes.
trial registrationISRCTN11023869 (retrospectively registered). PROTOCOL VERSION: 20/10/2025 version 1.5.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.