Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402915›Full record

ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025

Weight loss magnitude, prevalence and methods among male and female Olympic-level judo athletes.

Ayşe Feray Özbal, Arıkan Ektirici, Bayram Ceylan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ayşe Feray ÖzbalDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Türkiye.
Arıkan EktiriciDepartment of Physical Education and Sports, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Türkiye.
Bayram CeylanDepartment of Coaching Education, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Kastamonu University, Kastamonu, Türkiye. bceylan@kastamonu.edu.tr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight loss (WL) is common among judokas; however, most studies concentrate on non-elite competitors. This study examined the extent, methodologies, and contributing variables of WL among Olympic-level judo competitors during the qualifying cycle, positing that elevated WL scores signify detrimental practices. Research data was collected using the cross-sectional survey method. Research data was collected from 44 judokas (32 males, 12 females) rated in the top 50 globally during 2024 Antalya Grand Slam. Independent samples t-tests and Mann-Whitney U tests were used to assess between-group differences, while Spearman's rank-order correlation coefficients were calculated to assess the relationship between variables. Male athletes had markedly elevated typical weight loss percentages, peak career weight reduction (in kg and %), and post-competition weight return compared to females. Gradual dieting (87.9%), meal skipping (77.3%), increased exercise (72.7%), and sauna usage (70.5%) were the most common WL methods. The main sources of influence were coach/sensei (70.5%), fellow judokas (50%), and peers in the judo community (47.7%). Health professionals had little effect on WL behaviors. The age of judo practice onset was correlated with higher weight loss percentages and weight regain. Olympic-level judokas participate in substantial WL, mostly shaped by their coaching and peer dynamics. The results indicate that coaches and players need to have focused information to encourage safer ways to control their weight.

Indexed as

Rapid weight lossWeight lossWeight loss behaviorsWeight regain

Identifiers

PMID41402915
PMCPMC12750899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.