ArticleGenome medicine2025
Delineation and monitoring of the T cell repertoire of adoptive cell transfer product during the treatment of advanced melanoma.
Article in Genome medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAdoptive cell transfer (ACT) of tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) is an investigational treatment for solid tumours, with preliminary results showing objective clinical responses in some metastatic melanoma patients. The ability to sequence and track the T cell repertoire throughout ACT of TILs provides a method to identify T cell repertoire features associated with patients’ benefit from ACT. Identification of response biomarkers for patients receiving ACT of TILs has been limited. Conflicting evidence is observed in biomarkers such as the number of TILs in the infusion product, with some studies suggesting a relationship with response and others not. Meanwhile, certain potential biomarkers, such as the diversity of the post-infusion peripheral repertoire, have not yet been studied.
methodsIn this study, we sought to determine 1) the efficacy of using CapTCR-seq to track TILs in serial blood draws over the course of ACT immunotherapy 2) whether peripheral T cell repertoire statistics are associated with ACT response. In this study, 9 patients with cutaneous (n = 7) or mucosal (n = 2) melanoma received TIL ACT after chemotherapeutic depletion. Hybrid-capture CapTCR-seq was conducted on pre-/post-transfer peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and cell-free DNA.
resultsComparison between PBMC DNA, PBMC RNA, and circulating free DNA (cfDNA) repertoires demonstrated an increased presence of shared T cell clonotypes post-infusion when compared with baseline samples. Higher abundance of TIL clonotypes in the PBMC baseline and post-infusion DNA T cell repertoires and the presence of shared DNA T cell clonotypes between timepoints was seen in responders when compared with non-responders according to RECIST criteria.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate effective tracking methodologies and suggest a predictive role for baseline repertoire statistics in response to the ACT of TILs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.