ArticleCost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E2025
Economic evaluation of an employee health screening program for Hepatitis C virus in Pakistan.
Article in Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHepatitis C virus (HCV) causes significant global morbidity and mortality, and combating it is a global health priority. Pakistan has a particularly high burden of HCV, including cases that remain undetected and untreated.
methodsIn 2019, a pilot workplace health screening program for chronic diseases, including HCV, was launched at Aga Khan University in Pakistan. We performed an economic evaluation to determine its cost-effectiveness in screening for HCV, inform resource allocation decisions, and advance evidence in this field. Over the course of the screening pilot, 1,809 employees completed enrollment, blood tests, assessment, and consultation. Cost-effectiveness modeling was conducted using a combination of decision-tree and Markov approaches. Univariate and multivariate probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed.
resultsThe median final ICER was $307.39 per DALY averted. Uncertainty around the health status of those lost to follow-up produced a large confidence interval, from $167.92 to $1601.22 per DALY averted, depending on the assumptions made. This screening is estimated to save anywhere from 1 to 14 lives by preventing HCV-induced liver failure, depending on the burden of HCV in the lost to follow-up group, out of a total of 25 HCV-induced liver failure deaths in the control group, between a 44% and a 4% reduction.
conclusionsOur findings support that employee screening for HCV is cost-effective in high-prevalence areas such as Pakistan and a wise investment of health resources. The findings also point to programmatic improvements that could maximize the health benefits and improve the cost-effectiveness of other similar programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.