ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2025
The risk of all-cause injury and site-specific injury in athletes after concussion: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to quantify the risk of subsequent all-cause, recurrent concussion, upper extremity, and lower extremity injuries in athletes with a history of sport-related concussion.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, cohort studies published from inception through August 2025 were retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and EBSCO. The methodological quality of included studies was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS). Pooled odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects models. Pre-specified subgroup and meta-regression analyses were conducted to investigate sources of heterogeneity, including injury timing, study design, sport type, and athlete competition level.
resultsNineteen cohort studies involving 86,879 athletes were included. Athletes with a history of concussion had significantly higher odds of sustaining a subsequent all-cause injury (OR = 1.93; 95% CI = 1.39-2.68). The risk was most pronounced for recurrent concussion (OR = 3.06; 95% CI = 1.81-5.17), and was also significantly elevated for upper extremity (OR = 1.76; 95% CI = 1.10-2.81) and lower extremity injuries (OR = 1.49; 95% CI = 1.06-2.09). Given the high heterogeneity observed in the primary outcomes (I
conclusionA history of concussion significantly increases the risk of subsequent injuries, with the odds being highest for recurrent concussion. The persistence of this risk beyond six months suggests that clinical recovery does not equate to full functional recovery. These findings underscore the need for enhanced return-to-play protocols that incorporate objective functional assessments and targeted rehabilitation to mitigate the heightened vulnerability to injury in post-concussed athletes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.