Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402864›Full record

ArticleTrials2025

Assessment of shared decision-making tool for eliciting informed goals of care in the hospitalized elderly (ASKmeGOC): protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

Chris Martin, Kelly Cruise, Monica Aggarwal, Doug Austgarden, Giulio DiDiodato

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06002113 (Assessment of Shared Decision-making Tool for Eliciting Informed Goals of Care in the Hospitalized Elderly), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06002113 narecruitingnot on this map

Assessment of Shared Decision-making Tool for Eliciting Informed Goals of Care in the Hospitalized Elderly (ASKMEGOC): A Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorRoyal Victoria Hospital, CanadaRan2023 to 2027Enrolled1,200ConditionsGoals of Care, Patient Preference, End of LifeArmsGOCD Tool, Usual care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chris MartinCritical Care Medicine, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON, Canada.
Kelly CruiseResearch Institute, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON, Canada.
Monica AggarwalDalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Doug AustgardenCritical Care Medicine, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON, Canada.
Giulio DiDiodatoResearch Institute, Royal Victoria Regional Health Centre, Barrie, ON, Canada. didiodatog@rvh.on.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2074-1407

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGoals of care discussions (GOCDs) occur between patients, substitute decision-makers, and healthcare providers to ensure shared decision-making about treatment preferences that are aligned with both patients' values and goals and healthcare provider recommendations. GOCDs promote patient autonomy and high-value care. This study will examine the real-world effectiveness of using a novel ASKmeGOC e-tool (ASKmeGOC e-tool) to support nursing-facilitated GOCDs with patients and their substitute decision-makers. We hypothesize that these GOCDs will be acceptable to patients and attending physicians, promote more informed decisions about life-sustaining treatment preferences, and result in fewer undocumented CODE STATUS preferences that will result in both reduced rates of intensive care utilization and direct patient hospitalization costs compared to usual GOCDs conducted by physicians.

methodsThe ASKmeGOC trial is designed as a prospective, single-center, stratified, parallel group, allocation concealed, assessor masked, randomized, pragmatic, mixed-method, and comparative effectiveness trial. This study will enrol all consecutive hospitalized patients ≥ 80 years old. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to either the ASKmeGOC intervention or usual GOCD control group. The primary outcomes include total days of intensive care, ventilator and dialysis utilization during both the index hospitalization, and at 12 months post-admission. The hypothesized sample size is 950 participants per group to demonstrate a reduction in utilization of ≥ 20%. Count regression models will be used to analyze the primary outcomes using an intention-to-treat approach. DISCUSSION: Ensuring patient autonomy in medical decision-making is an essential human right, and GOCDs are critical to ensure patient-centered medical care. This study will evaluate the real-world effectiveness of a novel tool to facilitate GOCDs by non-physician healthcare providers. If shown to be effective, the plan is to spread and scale the tool to other acute care hospitals, primary care practices, and assisted living facilities to evaluate the implementation effectiveness of its use in different healthcare environments by different healthcare providers with the goal of ensuring equitable access to standardized GOCDs to all eligible patients.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT06002113. Registered on July 27, 2023.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedHospitalizationPatient Care PlanningPatient ParticipationAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansPatient PreferencePragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicDecision aidDecisional conflictFacilitated goals of care discussionsHospitalized patientsLife-sustaining treatment utilizationMixed-method study

Identifiers

PMID41402864
PMCPMC12822219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.