Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402846›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2025

Gut microbiome-derived indole-3-carboxaldehyde promotes intestinal development via AHR-NRF2 signaling in the early-life of chicks.

Yu-Xuan Huang, Zhang-Chao Deng, Ke-Xin Cao, Jia-Cheng Yang, Meng Liu, Ling Zhao, Jin-Shui Zheng, Lv-Hui Sun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yu-Xuan HuangNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Smart Farming Technology for Agricultural Animals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Zhang-Chao DengNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Smart Farming Technology for Agricultural Animals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Ke-Xin CaoNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Smart Farming Technology for Agricultural Animals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Jia-Cheng YangNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Smart Farming Technology for Agricultural Animals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Meng LiuNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Smart Farming Technology for Agricultural Animals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Ling ZhaoNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Smart Farming Technology for Agricultural Animals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Jin-Shui ZhengNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Smart Farming Technology for Agricultural Animals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China.
Lv-Hui SunNational Key Laboratory of Agricultural Microbiology, Key Laboratory of Smart Farming Technology for Agricultural Animals, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Hubei Hongshan Laboratory, Frontiers Science Center for Animal Breeding and Sustainable Production, College of Animal Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, 430070, China. lvhuisun@mail.hzau.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe development of the small intestine is crucial during early life, with the gut microbiota and microbe-derived metabolites playing key roles in regulating intestinal epithelial barrier function and overall development. However, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Here, chicks were used to investigate the influences of early-life crosstalk among bacteria, metabolites, and the host on small intestinal development.

resultsWe investigated bacterial succession in the small intestine of broiler chicks at four time points during early development. After 3 days post-hatch, Bacillota became the dominant phylum. At the genus level, Lactobacillus and Ligilactobacillus emerged as the two dominant genera, and their abundance was significantly positively correlated with small intestine weight. Metabolome analysis revealed that indole-3-carboxaldehyde (IAld) is derived from both L. gallinarum C2-16-2 (LG) and L. salivarius D7-21 (LS). Moreover, we found that IAld can be converted into bioactive indole-3-carboxylic acid (ICA) in animals, which exhibited greater biological activity than IAld in vitro. Further chick feeding trials revealed that both bacteria (LG and LS) and metabolites (IAld and ICA) promoted epithelial barrier function and enhanced antioxidant capacity during early life in chicks. Moreover, both IAld and ICA promoted tight junction protein expression and enhanced antioxidant capacity by activating AHR-NRF2 signaling.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that specific bacterial strains (L. gallinarum C2-16-2 and L. salivarius D7-21) and metabolites (IAld and ICA) serve as effective promoters of intestinal epithelial barrier function and antioxidant capacity during early intestinal development in chicks Video Abstract.

Indexed as

BacteriaChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeIndolesIntestine, SmallNF-E2-Related Factor 2Receptors, Aryl HydrocarbonAnimalsIntestinal MucosaSignal Transductionindole-3-carbaldehydeIndolesNF-E2-Related Factor 2Receptors, Aryl HydrocarbonChicksIndole-3-CarboxaldehydeIndole-3-Carboxylic acidIntestinal epithelial barrier functionLactobacillus

Identifiers

PMID41402846
PMCPMC12821288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.