ArticleBMC cancer2025
Preliminary study for the development of enhanced recovery after surgery program for free flap reconstruction in older population with advanced oral cancer: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program is a combined perioperative bundle designed to reduce perioperative stress. However, whether these programs are safe and effective for older patients who have undergone free-flap reconstruction for locally advanced oral cancers remains unclear. This study retrospectively evaluated the risk factors associated with delayed postoperative recovery and prolonged hospital length of stay (LOS) in older patients with locally advanced oral cancer who underwent resection and free-flap reconstruction from an ERAS perspective.
methodsSixty-one patients who underwent resection and free-flap reconstruction for locally advanced oral cancer were included. LOS, complications, nutritional intake, and mobilization were evaluated.
resultsThe older group exhibited a longer LOS, delayed oral feeding, and more aspiration pneumonia than the non-older group. Analysis of older adults only revealed delayed oral feeding, not chronological age, as a risk factor for prolonged LOS.
conclusionsOlder patients were safely managed using ERAS; however, dysphagia may have interfered with the enhanced recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.