Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402774›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2025

Parameter efficient fine-tunning of foundation model to facilitate tumor response prediction for ovarian cancer patients.

Ke Zhang, Patrik Gilley, Neman Abdoli, Theresa C Thai, Yong Chen, Lauren Dockery, Kathleen Moore, Robert S Mannel, Qinggong Tang, Yuchen Qiu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ke ZhangStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Patrik GilleySchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Neman AbdoliSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Theresa C ThaiDepartment of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Yong ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Lauren DockeryDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Kathleen MooreDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Robert S MannelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Qinggong TangStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA.
Yuchen QiuStephenson School of Biomedical Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, 73019, USA. qiuyuchen@ou.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn clinical practice, it is critically important to predict the tumor response of chemotherapy at an early stage. However, the performance of existing clinical markers cannot achieve satisfactory accuracy and reliability. To overcome this limitation, in this study we proposed a foundation model based approach to improve prediction performance.

methodsWe adopted a CLIP (Contrastive language-image pretraining) based foundation model, which contains a total of 12 transformer layers for both image and textual encoders. This model has been extensively pretrained on a non-medical image-text dataset. Meanwhile, a parameter efficient low rank adaptor (LoRA) was incorporated into the transformer layers for fine-tuning purpose. The adaptors were inserted at various layers of both encoders, and their corresponding performances were evaluated and compared. The experiments were conducted on a retrospective dataset containing a total of 182 advanced stage ovarian cancer cases, among which 124 were responders and 58 were non-responders.

resultsThe best performance was achieved by adding LoRA adaptors on the lowest 5 transformer layers for both image and textual encoders, which yields an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.785 ± 0.039 and an ACC (accuracy) of 0.780 ± 0.032. As a comparison, the conventional transfer learning strategy fine-tuned ResNet and ViT models achieved AUCs of 0.754 ± 0.089 and 0.707 ± 0.079, respectively.

conclusionThis study initially demonstrates the feasibility of parameter efficient training with a foundation model for chemotherapy response prediction, highlighting its potential to support clinical decision making.

Indexed as

Ovarian NeoplasmsFemaleHumansReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeChemotherapy response predictionFoundation modelsOvarian cancerParameter efficient training

Identifiers

PMID41402774
PMCPMC12709775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.