Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402770›Full record

ReviewJournal of nanobiotechnology2025

Nanomaterials in gene therapy and genome editing: challenges and emerging directions.

Mingyang Jiang, Ke Zhang, Zheng Wang, Ming Gao, Shanggui Su, Junjun He, Huihui Xu, Zhandong Bo, Zhenqi Jiang, Chengcheng Zhang and 2 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mingyang Jiang *Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Ke Zhang *Department of Bone and Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Zheng Wang *The Second Clinical Medical College of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Ming GaoLife Sciences Institute, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Shanggui SuGuangxi Medical University Yulin Campus, Yulin, China.
Junjun HeShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Huihui XuShanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China.
Zhandong BoDepartment of Bone and Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China.
Zhenqi JiangSchool of Medical Technology, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China. jiangzhenqi@bit.edu.cn.
Chengcheng ZhangLonghua Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, China. 18117022797@163.com.
James Hp HuiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. doshuij@nus.edu.sg.
Ruqiong WeiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China. weiruqiongxibanya@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanomaterials are redefining the landscape of gene and genome editing, yet their translation to clinical reality remains constrained by multiple unresolved challenges. While they provide structural and functional advantages for delivering nucleic acids and CRISPR/Cas systems across biological barriers, their behavior within living systems is often unpredictable, leading to issues such as off-target editing, immune activation, and inconsistent biodistribution. The design of nanocarriers, whether lipid-based, polymeric, inorganic, must therefore balance efficiency with safety, integrating physicochemical precision with biological adaptability. Recent advances in ionizable lipid nanoparticles demonstrate how fine-tuning charge, surface chemistry, and degradation kinetics can enhance endosomal escape and target specificity, but reproducibility and large-scale manufacturing continue to limit broader application. Moreover, polymeric and exosome-inspired systems promise modularity and targeted reuse, yet they demand clearer understanding of long-term biocompatibility and regulatory acceptance. The future of nanomaterial-enabled genome engineering depends not only on optimizing delivery vehicles but also on establishing predictive models of nano-bio interactions, harmonizing ethical oversight, and developing standardized evaluation pipelines that link nanoscale design to therapeutic outcomes.

Indexed as

Gene EditingGenetic TherapyNanostructuresAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsHumansLipidsNanoparticlesLipidsCRISPR–Cas deliveryEndosomal escapeGenome editing in vivoLipid nanoparticlesOff-target mitigationPolymeric nanoparticlesRegulatory considerationsTargeted gene delivery

Identifiers

PMID41402770
PMCPMC12822215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.