ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Anaphylactic shock following intravenous ranitidine in rural Nepal: a case report.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on "Anaphylactic shock following intravenous ranitidine in rural Nepal: a case report".International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRanitidine, a histamine-2 (H2) receptor antagonist, is widely used for acid-peptic disorders. Although generally safe, it is a rare but recognized cause of drug-induced anaphylaxis, with an estimated incidence of 0.2-0.7% for H2 receptor blockers and proton pump inhibitors. We report a near-fatal case of ranitidine-induced anaphylactic shock successfully managed in a rural hospital. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old female developed sudden shortness of breath, hypotension, and drowsiness within minutes of receiving a 50 mg intravenous (IV) dose of ranitidine for epigastric discomfort at a local clinic. She had no prior exposure to ranitidine or known allergies. On arrival, her blood pressure was 60 mmHg systolic, pulse 130/min, and SpO₂ 60%. She had diffused urticaria and wheezing. A diagnosis of anaphylactic shock was made. Immediate management included high-flow oxygen, intramuscular epinephrine (0.5 mg, 1:1000), followed by intravenous hydrocortisone. Significant improvement occurred within 10 minutes and she was discharged after 24 hours of observation.
conclusionThis case highlights that ranitidine, although commonly used, can rarely trigger severe anaphylactic shock even in patients without prior exposure or known allergies. Early recognition of the reaction and timely administration of intramuscular epinephrine were key to the patient's rapid recovery. Awareness of this potential adverse reaction is important for all clinicians who administer H2-receptor antagonists.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.