ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Analysis of factors affecting organizational engagement between pre-hospital and hospital emergency departments: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe provision of efficient and integrated emergency services constitutes a vital cornerstone for reducing mortality rates and improving clinical outcomes for patients and casualties within complex healthcare systems. Effective engagement between hospital-based and pre-hospital emergency services is crucial for the delivery of higher quality and more appropriate patient care. This study was conducted with the aim of analyzing the factors affecting organizational engagement between pre-hospital and hospital emergency departments.
methodsThis was a qualitative study employing a conventional content analysis approach, conducted across pre-hospital emergency services and affiliated educational hospitals of Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Iran, in 2025. Participants included 38 experienced stakeholders in the field, encompassing managers, supervisors, physicians, nurses, and emergency medical technicians. These individuals were selected using purposive sampling until data saturation was achieved. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and subsequently analyzed using MAXQDA software (Version 22). The credibility and trustworthiness of the findings were assessed according to Lincoln and Guba's criteria.
resultsData analysis revealed that organizational interaction between pre-hospital and hospital emergency services faced significant barriers, primarily attributable to poor managerial coordination, cognitive and professional limitations, and gaps in clinical practice. Specifically, the lack of effective inter-organizational communication, weak leadership in conflict resolution, and insufficient structural and human resource support were identified as key managerial obstacles. In the domain of cognitive and professional limitations, negative attitudes, knowledge and skills gaps, and decision-making biases-often arising under conditions of high workload or limited information-were found to reduce mutual understanding and collaboration between personnel across the two sectors. Regarding clinical practice gaps, the absence of standardized patient handover protocols, inconsistencies in the implementation of care processes, and deficiencies in initial clinical assessments disrupted care continuity and diminished overall service quality.
conclusionThe findings of this study provide scientific guidance for decision-makers seeking to establish a more integrated, efficient, and safer emergency system. Enhancing organizational engagement within the emergency system necessitates a multifaceted and policy-driven approach, wherein policymakers play a pivotal role in reforming organizational structures, empowering human resources, and standardizing operational processes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.