ArticleBMC plant biology2025
Deep learning-based seed variety classification: a case study in maize.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Response surface optimization of imazethapyr dose and application timing for weed suppression and faba bean yield.BMC plant biology · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep learning algorithms enable accurate identification of cassava varieties (Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
- Non-destructive identification of closely related japonica rice seeds using hyperspectral imaging combined with HHO-optimized XGBoost.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distinguishing among maize seed varieties is often challenging because of their morphological similarity and genetic diversity. Traditional seed identification methods frequently fail to balance accuracy, speed, and practicality, creating the need for innovative solutions. Recent advances in artificial intelligence, particularly in deep learning, provide promising alternatives for the precise classification of crop varieties. This study aimed to classify five maize seed genotypes (KSC201, KSC260, KSC400, KSC703, and KSC705) using only RGB digital images acquired under standardized lighting conditions. Image analysis and model training were performed in Python (Colab environment). The proposed convolutional neural network (CNN) model demonstrated excellent performance across all classes, achieving near-perfect accuracy, recall, and specificity for KSC260 and KSC703. The precision–recall analysis showed that KSC705 exhibited almost perfect classification with an average precision of 0.99, while KSC201 achieved 0.96. The overall model performance reached an accuracy of 96.67%, sensitivity of 96.67%, precision of 96.74%, and specificity of 99.18%. Results from the confusion matrix confirmed that the CNN effectively distinguished among all five maize genotypes, and the high area under the curve (AUC) values indicated almost perfect prediction capability. These findings demonstrate that CNN-based image analysis provides a reliable and accurate approach for seed variety identification, comparable to the performance of advanced architectures such as ConvNeXt_Tiny in other agricultural applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.