ArticleBMC primary care2025
Discussing spiritual health in primary care and the HOPE tool - a survey of social prescribers.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- "We Don't Normally Go Down This Avenue; This Is Normally Taboo": Using Co-Design to Develop a Training Intervention for Spiritual Health in Primary Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026Article
- 'Obviously, you can't outright ask': what are the barriers and facilitators to discussion of spiritual health within social prescribing? A study using semi-structured interviews.BMC primary care · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSocial prescribing aims to provide holistic care to patients and reduce health inequalities by meeting needs that expand beyond the biomedical model, as detailed in the National Health Service (NHS)'s Long Term Plan. While holistic care includes spiritual health, understanding of social prescribers' attitudes towards discussing spiritual health with their patients is limited. This study aimed to (1) explore social prescribers' views on discussing spiritual health with patients; and (2) identify key barriers and facilitators to incorporating spiritual health within their practice, including the potential for using a structured tool (the HOPE tool) to support discussions.
methodWe developed, piloted and administered a bespoke online survey for social prescribers working within primary care in the UK over two months, 1st August to 30th September 2024. This was based on our previous work with UK family doctors (general practitioners or GPs) on the topic of spiritual health and use of spiritual history-taking tools. The acceptability of the HOPE tool was investigated using patient vignettes drawn from clinical practice.
resultsOne hundred seventy-one social prescribers responded. One hundred and twenty (70%) reported that they felt comfortable asking patients about their spiritual health. A similar proportion (71%) felt that the HOPE tool was beneficial. Those who were uncomfortable with the topic did not appear to have their comfort affected by learning about the HOPE tool. Attitudes towards spiritual health fell into categories of embracing, pragmatic, guarded and rejecting. Barriers and facilitators to discussion of spiritual health included: a perceived need for patient cues and training; fear of causing offence or upset; and pre-existing practitioner attitudes towards and/or interest in the topic.
conclusionsSocial prescribers are positive about discussing spiritual health with patients and feel comfortable with the topic. The HOPE tool may be helpful where social prescribers are already happy to discuss spiritual health, but other approaches will be needed for those who are reluctant to broach the topic. If social prescribers are more comfortable with the topic of spiritual health than GPs, they may hold the answer to an area of unmet need. Training needs are highlighted for further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.