Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402718›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2025

SENet-SVWF: a spectral vegetation indices and wavelet features fusion method using squeeze and excitation network for predicting the SPAD value of maize leaves.

Baoping Yan, Fu Zhang, Fangyuan Zhang, Yakun Zhang, Yafei Wang, Sanling Fu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Baoping YanCollege of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003, China.
Fu ZhangCollege of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003, China. zhangfu30@126.com.
Fangyuan ZhangCollege of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003, China.
Yakun ZhangCollege of Agricultural Equipment Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471003, China.
Yafei WangCollege of Agricultural Engineering, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, 212013, China.
Sanling FuCollege of Physics Engineering, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang, 471023, China. fusanling@126.com.

Funding

Graduate Education Reform Project of Henan Province 2023SJGLX180YHenan Province key research and development project 251111110800the Scientific and Technological Project of Henan Province 252102230034 and 242102110337
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hyperspectral technology is used to monitor the SPAD (Soil and Plant Analysis Development) of maize, which is of great significance for regulating maize growth, optimizing nutrient management and improving yield formation. However, too much spectral information of hyperspectral data has resulted in the parameters redundancy and the complex structure of model. To solve this problem, a spectral vegetation indices (VIs) and wavelet features (WF) fusion method using squeeze-and-excitation network (SENet-SVWF) was proposed in this study. The partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and long short-term memory (LSTM) predictors and five pretreatment methods were used in predicting SPAD value of maize, and the best pretreatment method and predictor were determined. VIs and wavelet transform (WT) were used to analyze the spectral data after the best pretreatment. Pearson correlation analysis and peak extraction method were used to determine the combination of VIs and WF. The SENet was introduced to fuse the selected VIs and WF, and the corresponding weights of different spectral features were optimized. The results showed that the multivariate scattering correction (MSC) was identified as the best pretreatment method, and SVR and RFR predictors performed best. The model established using SE-VIs-WF spectral features combined with RFR has the highest accuracy. The R

Indexed as

Hyperspectral ImagingPlant LeavesWavelet AnalysisZea maysLeast-Squares AnalysisFeature fusionMaizeSPADVegetation indicesWavelet transform

Identifiers

PMID41402718
PMCPMC12709759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.