ArticleBMC plant biology2025
SENet-SVWF: a spectral vegetation indices and wavelet features fusion method using squeeze and excitation network for predicting the SPAD value of maize leaves.
Article in BMC plant biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperspectral technology is used to monitor the SPAD (Soil and Plant Analysis Development) of maize, which is of great significance for regulating maize growth, optimizing nutrient management and improving yield formation. However, too much spectral information of hyperspectral data has resulted in the parameters redundancy and the complex structure of model. To solve this problem, a spectral vegetation indices (VIs) and wavelet features (WF) fusion method using squeeze-and-excitation network (SENet-SVWF) was proposed in this study. The partial least squares regression (PLSR), support vector regression (SVR), random forest regression (RFR), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and long short-term memory (LSTM) predictors and five pretreatment methods were used in predicting SPAD value of maize, and the best pretreatment method and predictor were determined. VIs and wavelet transform (WT) were used to analyze the spectral data after the best pretreatment. Pearson correlation analysis and peak extraction method were used to determine the combination of VIs and WF. The SENet was introduced to fuse the selected VIs and WF, and the corresponding weights of different spectral features were optimized. The results showed that the multivariate scattering correction (MSC) was identified as the best pretreatment method, and SVR and RFR predictors performed best. The model established using SE-VIs-WF spectral features combined with RFR has the highest accuracy. The R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.