ArticlePharmaceutical research2025
Deep Dive into Generic Drug Applications to Seek Harmonization of Bioequivalence Criteria for Narrow Therapeutic Index Drugs.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeU.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommends reference scaled limits and variability comparison for bioequivalence (BE) demonstration of narrow therapeutic (NTI) drugs while most other regulatory agencies apply direct tightening of BE limits. This study evaluates strengths and limitations of different BE criteria using abbreviated new drug application (ANDA) data received by FDA to support harmonization of NTI drug BE criteria.
methodsWe analyzed four-way fully-replicated crossover BE study data in NTI ANDAs, applying BE criteria from different agencies and alternative criteria (e.g., Paixão's criteria, modified Paixão's and FDA criteria) to compare passing rates.
resultsCurrent EMA and FDA criteria seem stringent with NTI drugs having moderate and low within-subject variability (e.g., S
conclusionAlternative FDA criteria with capping at 90.00-111.11% when σ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.