ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2025
Mammo-GAN-Assisted Deep Network Training Scheme for Lesion Detection.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The performance of lesion detection deep networks is determined by how well the network can learn key features from borderline cases, but finding such cases is challenging. We propose to increase the number of borderline cases for a given network by converting existing training data through applying a Cycle-GAN-based Lesion Simulator (LS) and Lesion Remover (LR). We developed our LS-LR using the developmental portion (80%) of a 10,414 mammography patch dataset from 4789 unique patients (2416 with lesions and 2312 normals). LS creates lesions in normal patches and LR removes lesions from lesion patches, producing harder-to-distinguish cases. Importantly, training LS-LR at lower training epochs (25%, 50%, 75%) can modify the simulation impact. We trained a ResNet18 using a training set for a lesion detection task (baseline). Using our LS-LR at different training epochs, we converted the training samples to be more challenging and retrained the ResNet18 from scratch using the updated set. Our LS-LR at 50%/75% training epochs created the most effective samples for retraining ResNet18, and it achieved superior performance (AUC = 0.901) compared with the baseline (AUC = 0.870; p = 0.00005) on the test mammography dataset. External validation confirmed generalizability: for an independent mammogram dataset (134 lesions, 180 normals), AUC improved to 0.866 from 0.839 (p = 0.007); for a chest X-ray dataset (826 nodules/masses, 1642 normals), AUC improved to 0.975 from 0.964 (p = 0.011). The results showed that our LS-LR model improved lesion detection performance in mammograms and chest X-ray images by transforming existing data into borderline cases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41402618What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.