ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Staging Femoral Head Osteonecrosis with General-Purpose AI: Lessons from the Ficat-Arlet Classification.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Clinical and treatment-related determinants of advanced-stage femoral head osteonecrosis following COVID-19: a five-year retrospective cohort study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to conceptually evaluate the diagnostic capacity and limitations of a general-purpose vision-language model (ChatGPT-4o) in the radiographic staging of femoral head avascular necrosis (AVN) according to the Ficat-Arlet (FA) classification. Rather than proposing clinical implementation, this proof-of-concept investigation was designed to delineate the boundaries of general-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) in radiographic reasoning. A total of 240 anteroposterior pelvic X-ray images with corresponding clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based reference staging were retrospectively analyzed. Only plain radiographs were uploaded to ChatGPT-4o; no MRI data were provided. Each image was evaluated in a separate, independent session using a standardized English-language prompt. The model's staging outputs were compared with ground-truth labels using sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). ChatGPT-4o achieved a micro-averaged sensitivity of 25.8%, specificity of 79.5%, and mean AUC of 0.55 across all FA stages. The highest sensitivity was observed in Stage 0 (54.2%) and the lowest in Stage 4 (10.4%). Statistical comparison across stages revealed significant variation in diagnostic metrics, indicating stage-dependent inconsistency. While ChatGPT-4o demonstrated partial capacity for radiographic reasoning, its limited sensitivity, low AUC, and inconsistency across stages underscore the conceptual boundaries of general-purpose AI in diagnostic image interpretation. These findings highlight the necessity for task-specific training and balanced datasets to achieve reliable performance in orthopedic imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41402616What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.