ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2025
All together now: Random Forests analysis reveals the joint impact of multiple statistical regularities on eye-movements during reading.
Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A large and growing number of recent studies has embraced a statistical learning view of reading, revealing that readers utilize an array of regularities that are available in writing systems as they process printed words and texts. However, previous studies have focused on the impact of one regularity (or an otherwise small number of cues). Therefore, we currently have a limited understanding of (1) whether different regularities each carry unique explanatory power, beyond other (collinear) cues; (2) how do regularities at different levels of the input contribute to reading behavior; and (3) whether regularities vary in their contributions across processing stages. To answer these questions, we employ Random Forests analyses on a large-scale, eye-movement, passage-reading database from English first- and second-language readers, evaluating the relative importance of a large number of regularities on multiple eye-movement dependent variables. First, our findings demonstrate that, each regularity uniquely contributes to the model's performance. Second, we show that both text-level regularities (e.g., predictability) and word-level regularities (including print-speech and print-meaning regularities), contribute to continuous text reading. Third, we document varying contributions of some regularities over time, with later reading measures being more impacted by text-level regularities. These results support and extend statistical learning theories of reading, showing that readers are attuned to a range of regularities in their writing system, which jointly guide naturalistic reading behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.