ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning prediction of long-term sickness absence due to mental disorders using Brief Job Stress Questionnaire data.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Calibrated Deep-Learning Risk Indexing and Latent Behavioural Profiling for Occupational Mental-Health Risk Assessment.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comment on "Predicting mental health-related sick leave using stress check data: development and validation of a workplace risk model".Journal of occupational health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Long-term sickness absence (LTSA) is a significant issue, causing productivity decline, financial difficulties, and increased mental health issues, with mental disorders being the most common cause. Occupational stressors are also linked to increased risk of LTSA due to mental disorders (LTSA-MD). This study uses occupational stressors data, assessed using the Brief Job Stress Questionnaire from 2011 to 2022, to predict LTSA-MD using machine learning and sampling methods, assessing their performance. This study analyzes data from 231,425 Japanese public servants from 2011 to 2022, focusing on LTSA-MD incidents. We compared five machine learning models and six sampling methods (random sampling, equal size sampling, SMOTE-synthetic minority oversampling technique, bootstrapping, borderline-SMOTE and ADASYN-adaptive synthetic sampling) to predict LTSA-MD incidents, addressing class imbalance. We prioritized average precision (AP) to identify the most promising model–sampling combinations to give the severe class imbalance. The gradient boosted trees model and bootstrap oversampling method demonstrated highest AP among all integrations of machine learning and sampling methods, with a AP of 0.040 and a ROC-AUC of 0.81. However, no significant difference in superiority was observed between the combinations of higher-level AP machine learning and sampling methods. The results demonstrate that machine learning models’ predictive ability for LTSA-MD is generally low, requiring further research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.