Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402530›Full record

ReviewAnimal cognition2025

ManyFishes: a big team science collaboration on fish comparative cognition.

Laurent Prétôt, Christian Agrillo, Benjamin C Bluck, María J Cabrera-Álvarez, Yseult Héjja-Brichard, Kyndal Irwin, Annabell Klinke, Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato, Cait Newport, Ronen Segev and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Laurent PrétôtDepartment of Psychology and Counseling, Pittsburg State University, Pittsburg, KS, 66762, USA. laurent.pretot@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9936-5506
Christian AgrilloDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7391-8934
Benjamin C BluckInternational Centre for Ecohydraulics Research, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5849-9869
María J Cabrera-ÁlvarezFishEthoGroup Association, Faro, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5646-8743
Yseult Héjja-BrichardDepartment of Interdisciplinary Life Sciences, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3939-3852
Kyndal IrwinDepartment of Biology, Texas State University, San Marcos, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-9845-7526
Annabell KlinkeSchool of Natural Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-4837
Tyrone Lucon-XiccatoDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1017-9230
Cait NewportDepartment of Biology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6449-7296
Ronen SegevDepartment of Life Sciences, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8109-1076
Justin YeagerGrupo de Investigación en Biodiversidad, Medio Ambiente y Salud (BIOMAS), Facultad de Ingenierías y Ciencias Aplicadas, Universidad de Las Américas, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8692-6311

Funding

Mentoring CoreP20GM103418 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SUSAN J. BROWN · 2012 to 2026
$63.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103418
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fishes are among the oldest and most diverse groups of vertebrates, encompassing a vast array of species that differ in morphology, ecology, and behavior. While such diversity can pose challenges to comparative cognition research, it can also offer valuable insights into how different ecological and evolutionary pressures shape cognitive abilities. As the earliest diverging extant vertebrates, and the simplest neural architecture, fishes also provide a critical window into the origins and evolution of vertebrate intelligence. However, despite their potential, we have only just begun to scratch the surface of what fish cognition can reveal, in part due to practical limitations that have constrained cross-species comparisons, including the use of small, single-species samples and a lack of standardized testing procedures. To address these challenges, we introduce ManyFishes, the first big team science collaboration dedicated to comparative cognition and behavior in fishes. Here, we discuss the benefits, potential, challenges and solutions, and impact of this large-scale collaborative effort. Like other big team science initiatives, ManyFishes relies on the ability to establish an infrastructure that facilitates communication and coordination among collaborators from diverse backgrounds, while promoting openness, transparency, and reproducibility in fish cognition research. With this paper, we aim to raise awareness of the ManyFishes initiative and invite researchers to join, contribute to, and benefit from this large-scale collaborative effort in future projects.

Indexed as

CognitionFishesAnimalsBiological EvolutionCooperative BehaviorBig team scienceComparative cognitionFish cognitionFish diversityFishesMetascience

Identifiers

PMID41402530
PMCPMC12819542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.