Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402529›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2025

A spinal network of proprioceptive reflexes can produce a variety of bipedal gaits.

Elsa K Bunz, Daniel F B Haeufle, Syn Schmitt, Thomas Geijtenbeek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Elsa K BunzInstitute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany. elsa.bunz@imsb.uni-stuttgart.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0241-6451
Daniel F B HaeufleHertie Institute for Clinical Brain Research and Center for Integrative Neuroscience, Tuebingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3480-6892
Syn SchmittInstitute for Modelling and Simulation of Biomechanical Systems, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7768-8961
Thomas GeijtenbeekGoatstream, Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8352-8107

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) EXC 2075-390740016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proprioception is crucial for movement, yet the role of proprioceptive reflexes in legged locomotion is still poorly understood. While previous simulation studies have shown great potential for reflex-based control strategies, these controllers are typically geared to specific gaits, using hand-crafted feedback pathways that are linked to specific gait phases. In this work, we explore the control capabilities of a simple reflex controller that consists of only homonymous and antagonistic length and force feedback pathways with constant gains. This control model can be considered a highly simplified subset of spinal control rather than an attempt to emulate all spinal control functions. Despite its simplicity, we found our control framework capable of producing a wide variety of natural gaits, including walking and hopping, forwards and backwards, and running in different variations and at different velocities - without requiring any rhythmic inputs or high-level state machines modulating the feedback gains. Our work highlights the important role and flexibility of proprioceptive reflexes and suggests a necessary re-evaluation of their role in locomotion. Due to its simplicity and flexibility, our control framework provides a solid basis for the development of higher-level neuromuscular control systems.

Indexed as

GaitProprioceptionReflexSpinal CordBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansLocomotionWalking

Identifiers

PMID41402529
PMCPMC12783750

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.