ArticleAesthetic plastic surgery2026
Evaluation of Factors Affecting Bone Resorption After Eyebrow Arch Prosthesis Implantation Based on CT Three-Dimensional Imaging.
Article in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEyebrow arch implant surgery can effectively improve the contour of the eyebrow arch, but the bone resorption that occurs after implant placement is worthy of clinical attention. This study will review the bone resorption of the eyebrow arch in patients after eyebrow arch prosthesis implantation based on CT three-dimensional imaging and evaluate the factors affecting bone resorption of the eyebrow arch.
methodsThis study included a total of 51 participants who had previously had eyebrow arch implants. Three-dimensional imaging was used to measure and record parameters such as bone resorption, prosthesis position, distance between prosthesis and eyebrow bone, and thickness of the frown muscle. The impact of each factor on bone resorption was evaluated through analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square test.
resultsThe research results indicate that the closer the prosthesis is to the eyebrow bone, the thicker the muscles above the prosthesis, the easier it is for bone resorption to occur. But the thickness of the frown muscle, the position, width, thickness, and length of the prosthesis have almost no effect on bone resorption.
conclusionCT three-dimensional imaging can help evaluate the influencing factors of bone resorption after eyebrow arch prosthesis implantation, thereby helping clinical doctors improve treatment methods and providing patients with safer and more effective treatment options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine Ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .
Indexed as
Identifiers
41402503What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.