Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402475›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

The impact of pre-processing techniques on deep learning breast image segmentation.

Jéssica Catarino, Nuno Cruz Garcia, Sara Silva, João Santinha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jéssica CatarinoLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal. jessica.catarino@research.fchampalimaud.org.
Nuno Cruz GarciaLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sara SilvaLASIGE, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016, Lisbon, Portugal.
João SantinhaDigital Surgery Lab, Breast Cancer Research Program, Champalimaud Foundation, 1400-038, Lisbon, Portugal. joao.santinha@research.fchampalimaud.org.

Funding

Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia 2022/12283/BDLASIGE Research Unit UID/00408/2025Plano de Recuperação e Resiliência C644937233-00000047
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most common forms of cancer worldwide, making breast imaging a critical area for developing and evaluating Deep Learning methods. In this study, we investigate how different pre-processing techniques influence model performance in breast image segmentation. Pre-processing is a crucial step in the Deep Learning pipeline that directly impacts model performance, yet studies on its role in medical imaging remain limited. We assess the influence of different pre-processing techniques on a U-Net segmentation model applied to two breast public imaging datasets: CBIS-DDSM and Duke-Breast-Cancer-MRI. We systematically explored commonly used methods, including pixel intensity normalization, spacing harmonization, resizing/padding, and orientation standardization. Two processing pipelines were developed: Domain Non-Specific, integrating standard practices from natural and medical image analysis, and Domain Specific, which preserves anatomical information through careful handling of breast imaging metadata. A detailed comparative analysis of each pre-processing technique was conducted to evaluate its impact on model performance. Despite challenges and limitations associated with dataset size and scope, our findings identify pre-processing strategies tailored for breast imaging that can improve segmentation accuracy and analysis. This study represents an initial step in evaluating pre-processing for medical image analysis, providing a foundation for future work. Our results highlight significant differences in a 3-way ANOVA F-test ([Formula: see text]) for U-Net segmentation outcomes, attributed to different pixel intensity normalization approaches, offering valuable insights for future research.

Indexed as

BreastBreast NeoplasmsDeep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedFemaleHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance Imaging

Identifiers

PMID41402475
PMCPMC12789679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.