ArticleScientific reports2025
LBNet: an optimized lightweight CNN for mammographic breast cancer classification with XAI-based interpretability.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A minimal-net CNN model for an IoT-based brain tumor detection and monitoring system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- BrainFusionNet: a deep learning and XAI model to understand local, global, and sequential features of MRI images for improved brain tumour detection.Brain informatics · 2026Article
- A lightweight convolutional neural network for real-time monitoring of smart mango orchard systems.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A lightweight hybrid CNN and transformer model for medicinal leaf disease classification with explainable AI.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Breast cancer represents a major worldwide health burden, marked by high incidence and mortality rates across diverse socioeconomic populations. While deep learning has enabled advances in automated mammographic analysis, existing models often suffer from high computational complexity. They also face limited generalizability and a lack of interpretability. To overcome these challenges, this research introduces LBNet, a lightweight and interpretable convolutional neural network (CNN) built for accurate and efficient breast cancer detection, particularly in resource-constrained settings. With only 2.4 million trainable parameters, LBNet consists of five convolutional layers, leveraging ReLU activation, batch normalization, and max-pooling to optimize feature extraction while maintaining computational efficiency. LBNet was trained on the RSNA dataset using the Adam optimizer and five-fold cross-validation. It achieved 97.28% accuracy. For cancer cases, precision was 99% and recall was 96%. For non-cancer cases, precision was 96% and recall was 99%. In comparison, baseline models such as VGG19, SE-ResNet152, and ResNet152V2 yielded lower accuracies of 87.54%, 87.50%, and 85.24%, respectively, while transfer learning approaches peaked at 87.37% accuracy. LBNet's generalizability was validated in external datasets, achieving 99.54% accuracy on CBIS-DDSM and 98.50% on MIAS. To enhance clinical trust, this work integrated SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) and Grad-CAM (Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping). These methods effectively highlighted diagnostically relevant regions in mammograms. This improved prediction transparency. LBNet demonstrates strong potential as an accurate, efficient, and interpretable solution for breast cancer screening, and future studies could explore its extension to multi-view mammography and real-time clinical deployment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.