ArticleScientific reports2025
Efficient convolutional neural networks for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia prediction in computer vision.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in deep learning for leukemia diagnosis: a scoping review of diagnostic modalities and fusion-based approaches.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A dangerous hematological malignancy, acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) has a survival rate that is drastically affected by how long it takes to diagnose the disease. Though convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have improved medical imaging, the clinical dependability of most previous research is limited due to their reliance on single models, imbalance in the datasets, and absence of statistical validation. This study proposes an ensemble framework integrating pre-trained CNNs (DenseNet-121, ResNet-34) for feature extraction with machine learning classifiers-Support Vector Machine (SVM), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN), Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost, and Backpropagation Network (BPN). Experiments on the C-NMC leukemia dataset (10,661 images) show that the ensemble achieves 92.5% accuracy and 93.1% F1-score, outperforming DenseNet-121 and ResNet-34 by 5.6% and 6.3%, respectively. The model also records the highest AUC (0.975) across classifiers. Statistical tests (t-test, Wilcoxon) confirm that the improvements are significant (p < 0.05). The proposed method demonstrates practical potential as an automated clinical decision-support tool, reducing manual interpretation errors and expediting diagnosis. By combining CNN-based deep features with ensemble machine learning, the framework improves robustness, sensitivity, and applicability in real-world hematology workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.