ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025
SLEEPYLAND: trust begins with fair evaluation of automatic sleep staging models.
Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The Potential of Ensemble-Based Automated Sleep Staging on Single-Channel EEG Signal From a Wearable Device.Journal of sleep research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Automatic sleep staging with deep learning has advanced considerably, yet clinical adoption remains hindered by limited generalization, model bias, and inconsistent evaluation practices. We present SLEEPYLAND, an open-source framework comprising ~ 220,000 h of in-domain and ~ 84,000 h of out-of-domain polysomnographic recordings, spanning diverse ages, disorders, and hardware configurations. We release pre-trained state-of-the-art models, evaluating them across single- and multi-channel EEG/EOG setups. We introduce SOMNUS, an ensemble that integrates models via soft-voting, achieving robust performance across 24 datasets (macro-F1, 68.7-87.2%), outperforming individual models in 94.9% of cases and exceeding prior state-of-the-art. Exploiting the Bern-Sleep-Wake-Registry (N = 6633), we show that while SOMNUS improves generalization, no model architecture consistently minimizes model demographic/clinical bias. On multi-annotated datasets, SOMNUS surpasses the best human scorer (macro-F1, 85.2% vs 80.8% on DOD-H, and 80.2% vs 75.9% on DOD-O), more closely reproducing consensus. Finally, ensemble disagreement metrics predict scorer ambiguity (ROC-AUC 82.8%), providing reliable proxies for human uncertainty.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.