ArticleScientific reports2025
Development of an automated transformer-based text analysis framework for monitoring fire door defects in buildings.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Training-FreeDetector-to-Promptable-Segmenter Integration for Stacked Cartons: Prompt Accuracy-Efficiency Trade-Offs.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Object Detection and Scene Perception for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles Using LM-JEPA.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- YOLOv10-based multi-scale variant object detection for multi-category PPE non-compliance monitoring on construction sites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Fire door defects in residential buildings negatively impact construction management by reducing fire safety effectiveness, increasing the likelihood of smoke and fire spreading, and consequently putting occupant safety at greater risk. To address this critical safety issue, this study proposes and evaluates five transformer-based text classification methods-BERT, RoBERTa, ALBERT, DistilBERT, and XLNet-for automated defect detection. These methods are optimized using both common and method-specific hyperparameters, resulting in 1,458 model variants evaluated through multiple metrics. Among these, the optimized RoBERTa achieves the highest performance, demonstrating F1 scores of 92.13% (frame gap), 87.29% (door closer adjustment), 78.17% (contamination), 82.89% (dent), 80.17% (scratch), 96.66% (sealing components), 98.43% (mechanical components), and 67.81% (others), yielding an average F1 score of 85.44%. Furthermore, RoBERTa significantly outperforms the other optimized 535 text classification models (ANN, SVM, DT, LR, 1D CNN, and LSTM). These results underscore the potential and effectiveness of transformer-based methods for safety management in real-world construction scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.