Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402401›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Automated computer vision and dose-response modeling improve throughput and accuracy of an ex vivo functional precision medicine platform.

Noah Bell, Andrew Buckley, Breanna Mann, Xiaopei Zhang, Adebimpe Adefolaju, Rajaneekar Dasari, Rami Darawsheh, David E Kram, Shawn Hingtgen, Andrew B Satterlee

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Noah BellEshelman Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Andrew BuckleyEshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Breanna MannEshelman Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Xiaopei ZhangEshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Adebimpe AdefolajuEshelman Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Rajaneekar DasariEshelman Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Rami DarawshehEshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
David E KramDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Shawn HingtgenEshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacoengineering and Molecular Pharmaceutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 125 Mason Farm Rd, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA. hingtgen@email.unc.edu.
Andrew B SatterleeEshelman Innovation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. satterle@email.unc.edu.

Funding

CTSA K12 Program at UNCK12TR004416 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI Michelle Hernandez, Jonathan J Juliano · 2023 to 2026
$6.5M
A consortium effort to translate therapies for neurological diseases via an ex vivo organotypic platformU01TR003715 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BALDWIN, ALBERT SIDNEY, FLORES, CATHERINE T · 2021 to 2024
$4.6M
NCATS NIH HHS K12 TR004416NCATS NIH HHS U01 TR003715NCATS NIH HHS U01TR003715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional Precision Medicine platforms face significant obstacles to clinical translation, including stringent requirements for analytical consistency. In this study, we present an automated data analysis workflow for an organotypic brain slice culture-based functional assay that addresses these concerns by combining computer vision and dose-response modeling approaches. Automation reduces analysis time by approximately 99% compared to the original manual workflow (from ~ 20 h to ~ 15 min to analyze an 11-drug assay), increasing throughput capabilities and freeing researchers from tedious analyses. Comparison of automated measurements with previously published manual results revealed that automation increased consistency both within experiments and across replicate experiments by removing human subjectivities. Our workflow demonstrates how to implement computer vision using limited computational resources and minimal programming expertise by leveraging cloud-based, user-friendly ML tools (e.g., Biodock) integrated into local scripts. It also addresses challenges in automated modeling of datasets that include diverse dose-response behaviors, such as hormesis and plateau effects. Finally, we outline a validation strategy for automated analysis in the absence of gold-standard measurements, an issue common in functional assays where manual measurements involve user subjectivity.

Indexed as

Precision MedicineAnimalsAutomationBrainDose-Response Relationship, DrugHumansWorkflowAutomationComputer visionFunctional precision medicineMachine learningPatient-derived

Identifiers

PMID41402401
PMCPMC12808226

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.