ArticleScientific reports2025
From prediction to sustainability: AI for smart energy management in wastewater treatment plants.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), accurate energy forecasting is crucial for optimizing operations, promoting self- sufficiency, and ensuring sustainability. We compare and evaluate the performance of Machine Learning (ML) techniques for energy self-consumption (i.e., long-term memory (LSTM), support vector machines (SVM), recurring neural networks (RNN), gated recurrent units (GRU), and XGBoost), to forecast energy generation (EG) and energy consumption (EC) in WWTPs. The performance of models is evaluated using metrics (i.e., mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and root mean square error (RMSE)), based on a solid dataset of daily operating records. The findings show that GRU achieves the highest performance, with an RMSE of 0.102, MAE of 0.085, and R² of 0.978, followed by LSTM, GRU, and RNN. The models demonstrate temporal prediction capabilities, as well as driving energy efficiency and reducing operational costs in WWTPs. This paper offers insights into implementing ML for sustainable energy management in WWTPs to energy forecasting, enhancing energy self-consumption, and boosting operational efficiency and environmental sustainability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.