ArticleScientific reports2025
A retrospective cohort study on the association between allergic rhinitis, sublingual immunotherapy, and COVID-19 symptomatology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The impacts of allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have not been fully understood. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effects of AR and SLIT on symptoms of COVID-19 within one month after Chinese authorities adjusted their COVID-19 response measures. The study enrolled 1368 participants, including 746 AR patients and 622 controls without allergic diseases. SLIT was administered to 122 infected AR patients (AR with SLIT group), while it was not administered to the other 483 infected AR patients (AR without SLIT group). Patients’ outcomes were compared after propensity score matching (PSM). The data showed that AR played a dual role in COVID-19, acting as both a protective factor against respiratory symptoms and a risk factor increasing the likelihood of olfactory/gustatory dysfunctions and fever, compared to non-allergic individuals. Conversely, AR patients treated with SLIT presented a higher risk of respiratory symptoms but a lower risk of fever. SLIT did not influence the risk of olfactory/gustatory dysfunctions. Thus, respiratory symptoms should be considered when deciding whether to apply SLIT in AR patients with COVID-19. Additionally, the risk of fever should also be taken into account.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.