ReviewNPJ breast cancer2025
Computational pathology in breast cancer: optimizing molecular prediction through task-oriented AI models.
Review in NPJ breast cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An evidence informed framework for artificial intelligence in rare breast cancers using small cohort validation synthetic data practices and clinical governance.Discover oncology · 2026Review
- Advances in Breast Cancer Diagnostics: From Screening to Precision Medicine.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Evaluation of Large Language Models in Infectious Disease Decision-Making: From Examination to Clinical Practice.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in breast cancer pathology has been driven by the promise of "big data"-based foundation models: large deep learning systems deriving diagnostic and prognostic insights from digitized whole slide images (WSIs). Yet, despite progress in computational power and architectures, these models face obvious barriers to clinical use, including poor workflow integration, limited explainability, and reduced generalizability across diverse clinical settings. This article examines the opportunities provided by small, task-oriented AI models designed to predict clinically relevant molecular features in breast cancer, such as hormone receptors (HRs), HER2, Ki-67, BRCA-related status, and somatic mutations directly from WSIs. To overcome foundation model constraints, approaches like model distillation, weak supervision, and modular training are critically examined. Progress now depends on high-quality datasets, rigorous multi-institutional validation, and collaboration between computational scientists, clinicians, and regulators to deliver explainable, clinically actionable innovations in breast cancer.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.