ArticleScientific reports2025
Computational drug repositioning approach to predict multi-target therapeutics for epilepsy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Molecular docking analysis of FAS II fromBioinformation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epilepsy affects millions of people globally, with approximately one-third of patients experiencing drug-resistant seizures. Developing new anti-epileptic drugs is time-intensive and costly, prompting interest in computational drug repositioning strategies. Here, we report on a comprehensive drug repositioning approach to identify the multi-targeted therapeutic option(s) for epileptic seizures. All approved drugs from the DrugBank database were screened for their anti-epileptic properties, which involved predicting their blood-brain permeability and clustering them based on structural similarity with marketed anti-epilepsy drugs. The screened drugs were subjected to molecular docking against previously identified therapeutic target proteins (Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel α2; GABA receptor α1-β1; and Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel α1G), A total of 46 drugs showed better binding affinity than the respective standard drugs - Carbamazepine, Clonazepam and Pregabalin for the selected target proteins - Voltage-Gated Sodium Channel α2; GABA receptor α1-β1; and Voltage-Gated Calcium Channel α1G, respectively. The binding pocket and literature data mining revealed three drugs, Oxaprozin, Pizotifen, and Cyproheptadine, that bind within the precise binding pocket and have no reported severe side effects related to seizure onset. The molecular dynamics simulation studies revealed that all three compounds exhibited more stable and better binding interactions with their corresponding drug targets. Oxaprozin, among the identified three drugs, showed a very stable binding and can be considered a potential repurposed drug for epilepsy, warranting further preclinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.