Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41402333›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Processing of natural scenes in the human pulvinar.

Daniel R Guest, Emily J Allen, Kendrick N Kay, Michael J Arcaro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel R GuestDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA. daniel_guest@urmc.rochester.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8588-9336
Emily J AllenDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8221-4875
Kendrick N KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR), Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6604-9155
Michael J ArcaroDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4612-9921

Funding

Thalamocortical cognitive networks in the healthy human brainP50MH132642 · NIMH · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Zhe Sage Chen · 2023 to 2026
$15.7M
National Science Foundation (NSF) CRCNS IIS-1822683National Science Foundation (NSF) NRT-UtB1734815NIMH NIH HHS P50 MH132642U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) P50MH132642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Theories of high-level visual processing and object recognition have typically focused on ventral visual cortex, often overlooking potential contributions of subcortical structures. The pulvinar, via extensive connections with visual cortex, is well-positioned to play a role in high-level vision. Here, we investigated how the pulvinar represents visual information using a high-resolution 7 T fMRI dataset of responses to tens of thousands of natural scenes. Encoding models targeting different stimulus features revealed a pulvinar region selective for bodies and faces presented in the contralateral visual hemifield. Complementary model-free analyses demonstrated that this region is co-active with body- and face-selective cortical areas during natural scene viewing. These findings challenge cortico-centric models of object vision by demonstrating that principles of cortical organization, including functional clustering and hierarchical organization, also manifest in subcortex. Moreover, they highlight the value of using naturalistic stimuli to probe visual function.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualPulvinarVisual CortexVisual PerceptionAdultBrain MappingFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41402333
PMCPMC12824234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.