ArticleNature communications2025
Processing of natural scenes in the human pulvinar.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Triple-N dataset: large-scale fMRI-guided dense recordings of nonhuman primate neural responses to natural scenes.Nature neuroscience · 2026Article
- A 5.0 T Ultra-High-Field fMRI Dataset for Naturalistic Visual Scene Processing.Scientific data · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Theories of high-level visual processing and object recognition have typically focused on ventral visual cortex, often overlooking potential contributions of subcortical structures. The pulvinar, via extensive connections with visual cortex, is well-positioned to play a role in high-level vision. Here, we investigated how the pulvinar represents visual information using a high-resolution 7 T fMRI dataset of responses to tens of thousands of natural scenes. Encoding models targeting different stimulus features revealed a pulvinar region selective for bodies and faces presented in the contralateral visual hemifield. Complementary model-free analyses demonstrated that this region is co-active with body- and face-selective cortical areas during natural scene viewing. These findings challenge cortico-centric models of object vision by demonstrating that principles of cortical organization, including functional clustering and hierarchical organization, also manifest in subcortex. Moreover, they highlight the value of using naturalistic stimuli to probe visual function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.