ArticleNature communications2025
Rapid culture-free diagnosis of clinical pathogens via integrated microfluidic-Raman micro-spectroscopy.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid Diagnostics for Distinguishing Bacterial and Viral Infections: A Review of Technologies, Clinical Utility, and Stewardship Implications.Biosensors · 2026Review
- Portable Raman spectroscopy combined with machine learning for rapid and label-free recognition of five pathogenic bacteria.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a critical global health challenge, demanding rapid and accurate diagnostics to guide timely antimicrobial therapy. Current diagnosis is hindered by prolonged culturing and difficulties detecting low pathogen loads. Here, we present a culture-free diagnostic platform that integrates microfluidics, Raman micro-spectroscopy, and deep learning to deliver "sample-to-report" testing within 20 min. The microfluidic enrichment system employs dialysis-dielectrophoresis (DEP) technology to rapidly isolate pathogens directly from clinical samples with a detection limit as low as <2 colony forming unit (CFU)/ml. Combining a single-cell Raman fingerprint database of 342 clinical isolates from 29 bacterial and 7 fungal species with a 1D ResNet deep learning model, our approach achieved 95.1% accuracy in lab settings. Validated in a 305-patient clinical study involving primary urine and other clinical samples, it demonstrated 95.4% agreement with traditional culture methods and 98.5% sensitivity in diagnosing infections. While broader validation is needed for clinical implementation, the integrated, rapid diagnosis pipeline, as well as broad-spectrum detection, offer a promising solution for next-generation diagnostics for combating AMR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.