ArticleThe American journal on addictions2026
Monitoring outcomes of substance use disorder among healthcare professionals in Utah: A retrospective study of the professionals health program.
Article in The American journal on addictions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesSubstance use disorders (SUD) among healthcare professionals threaten both patient safety and workforce stability. Professional health programs (PHPs) aim to support recovery and safe practice reentry, yet outcomes for non-physician professionals remain underexplored. This study assessed return to use and professional outcomes among healthcare professionals monitored through the Utah Professionals Health Program (UPHP), a cohort predominantly composed of non-physician participants.
methodsA retrospective cohort study used data from 183 UPHP participants with SUD (60.7% nurses) enrolled between 2013 and 2024. The primary outcome was return to use, defined by positive toxicology results or self-report. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of return to use.
resultsReturn to use occurred in 48.6% of participants, with the highest incidence (33.9%) in year one. By year five, 81.4% had completed monitoring, and 55.9% were working full-time in healthcare. In adjusted models, age (OR = 0.93 per year, p = .039), duration of SUD before UPHP enrollment (OR = 1.14 per year, p = .004), and injury history (OR = 0.23, p = .017) were significantly associated with return to use. DISCUSSION AND
conclusionsThis non-physician dominant cohort highlights need for early recovery support and profession-specific care. Return to use was most frequent in year one, underscoring the need for intensive early-phase monitoring. Tailored support for injury-related substance use, along with peer support and employment services may improve outcomes. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: Findings provide novel insight into recovery outcomes for non-physician healthcare professionals in a PHP, a group underrepresented in addiction research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.