ArticleHospital pediatrics2026
Neonatal Toxicology Testing: Ethical Considerations for Pediatricians.
Article in Hospital pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatricians caring for newborns during the birth hospitalization are tasked with identifying and managing newborns with prenatal substance exposure and neonatal opioid withdrawal syndrome (NOWS) and coordinating care plans for affected families. Neonatal toxicology testing (NTT) is a frequently used tool to identify and clinically manage NOWS. At times, however, the harms of testing may outweigh the benefits. Current variability in NTT practices continue to result in negative consequences and harm to affected newborns and their families, adding to perpetuation of bias, inequity in who is tested, and separation of newborns from families. This article highlights well-described ethical principles and frameworks that have the potential to inform clinical practice and policies related to exposed newborns and NTT, which can help to align medical care and legislative requirements, reduce variability and inequity found in current testing approaches, and optimize the health and well-being of affected newborns and families. Pediatricians are well positioned to provide education, influence policy, and challenge the current use of NTT results in legislative definitions of NOWS. Along with hospital leaders, pediatricians should critically examine current toxicology testing practices and hospital policies with the goal of developing supportive, rather than punitive, approaches to care. This article focuses on in utero opioid exposure and may be more generally applied to exposure to other substances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.