ArticleJMIR mHealth and uHealth2025
Exploring the Fit Between the Outputs of Freely Available Medication Adherence Apps and Users' Needs: Mixed Methods Study.
Article in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMedication nonadherence is a significant barrier to therapy success. Smartphone apps represent reasonable tools for simple adherence-enhancing interventions. Many adherence apps are available in app stores with diverse content, quality, and outputs. We define "output of an adherence app" as the processing and visualization of data recorded by the user and related to adherence. In 2016, Santo et al defined 5 desirable features in the output of adherence apps: tracking history, charts, statistics, rewards, and an exportable file. With this, a reference point to evaluate outputs of adherence apps was delivered. Identifying and fulfilling users' needs are essential when developing an adherence app for patients' self-management and professional adherence services, such as therapy support provided by health care professionals (HCPs).
objectiveWe aimed to investigate the smartphone app market regarding desirable features in the outputs, explore the users' needs, and evaluate the concordance.
methodsWe searched for smartphone adherence apps in the 2 largest commercial app repositories by using keywords. Search results were screened for eligibility by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eligible, freely available apps were tested regarding desirable features in their output. We conducted 2 focus groups and a cross-sectional online survey to explore users' needs. Survey participants rated their desire for features on a 7-point Likert scale. Focus groups were analyzed using the previously reported framework method. Descriptive statistics were calculated by median and IQR or mean and SD. We compared survey subgroups with a 2-tailed t test. A P value <.05 was considered statistically significant.
resultsWe screened 80 apps for eligibility and included 9 in our analyses. All desirable features were present, with tracking history being the most frequent feature (in 8/9 apps). Other desirable features were observed in 3 or fewer of the apps. Eight individuals participated in the 2 focus groups. During the focus groups, a total of 13 categories of desired features emerged. All 5 desirable features were rated as important in adherence apps. Three additional features were mentioned: (1) professional feedback regarding therapy or intake course, (2) additional recommendations based on intake course, and (3) option to discuss the data with an HCP. A total of 42 individuals participated in the online survey. Tracking history was the most desired (mean rating of 5.29) and rewards the least desired feature (mean rating of 2.81) in the output. There was ambivalence regarding professional feedback, statistics, and charts. Participants with or without regular medication use showed no significant differences.
conclusionsThe outputs delivered by freely available smartphone adherence apps only partly match users' needs. Users showed a special interest in the interpretation of their data with an HCP. Therefore, adherence apps cannot substitute for the HCP but can be used to enhance current patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.