ReviewJMIR biomedical engineering2025
Noise-Resilient Bioacoustics Feature Extraction Methods and Their Implications on Audio Classification Performance: Systematic Review.
Review in JMIR biomedical engineering, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Bioacoustics classification plays a crucial role in ecological surveillance and neonatal health monitoring. Infant cry analysis can aid early health diagnostics, while ecological acoustics informs conservation. However, the presence of environmental noise, signal variability, and limited annotated datasets often hinders model reliability and deployment. Robust feature extraction and denoising techniques have become critical for improving model robustness, enabling more accurate interpretation of acoustic events across diverse bioacoustic domains under real-world conditions. Objective: This review systematically evaluates advancements in noise-resilient feature extraction and denoising techniques for bioacoustics classification. Specifically, it explores methodological trends, model types, cross-domain transferability between clinical and ecological applications, and evidence for real-world deployment. Methods: A systematic review was conducted by searching 8 electronic databases, including IEEE Xplore, ScienceDirect, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, and Scopus, through December 2024. Eligible studies entailed audio-based classification models and applied empirical or computational evaluations of bioacoustics classification using machine learning or deep learning methods. In addition, studies also included explicit or implicit consideration of noise. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed quality. Risk of bias was assessed using a customized tool, and reporting quality was evaluated using the TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis) checklist. Results: Of the 5462 records, 132 studies met the eligibility criteria. The majority (112/132, 84.8%) of studies focused on model innovation, with deep learning and hybrid approaches being the most dominant. Feature extraction played a critical role, with 96.2% (127/132) of studies clearly demonstrating feature extraction. Mel frequency cepstral coefficients, spectrograms, and filter bank-based representations were the most common feature representations. Nearly half (62/132, 47%) of the studies incorporated noise-resilient methods, such as adaptive deep models, wavelet transforms, and spectral filtering. However, only 14.4% (19/132) demonstrated real-world deployment across neonatal care and ecological field settings. Conclusions: The integration of noise-resilient techniques has significantly improved classification performance, but real-world deployment and proper use of denoising strategies in various datasets remain limited. Cross-domain synthesis reveals shared challenges, including dataset heterogeneity, inconsistent reporting, and reliance on synthetic noise. Future work should prioritize harmonized benchmarks, cross-domain generalization, and deployment, as well as opportunities for transferability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.