Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41401409›Full record

ArticleRevista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia2025

Delays in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer in the department of Meta, 2017–2023: a cross-sectional study

César García-Balaguera, Sandra Patricia Ruiz Rodríguez

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Revista colombiana de obstetricia y ginecologia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

César García-BalagueraSchool of Medicine, Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia. Villavicencio (Colombia).ORCID 0000-0002-0750-5541
Sandra Patricia Ruiz RodríguezSecretaría de Salud del Meta. Villavicencio (Colombia).ORCID 0009-0008-9646-1704

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To describe the prevalence of the different delays in the diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer, to estimate its incidence in the Department of Meta (Colombia) in recent years, and to conduct an exploratory analysis of potential factors associated with these delays Material and methods: Cross-sectional study of newly reported cases of cervical cancer in the Epidemiological Surveillance System of the National Institute of Health of Colombia between 2017 and 2023. The proportion of cases in which delays in the care process were identified was described, as well as the annual incidence rate of cervical cancer based on population data. Results: A total of 824 cases were included. Delays of more than 60 days in the care process were observed in 56.9% of the cases. These delays were attributed to patients in 33.9% of cases due to lack of knowledge or geographic, cultural, or economic barriers; to health services in 36.2% of cases due to lack of timely care; and to insurers in 22.9% of cases due to administrative barriers. Conclusions: Delays in the care process are common in Meta. These delays particularly affect women over 40 years of age and those residing in rural areas. Analytic and qualitative studies are needed to further explore the underlying causes of these delays.

Indexed as

Delayed DiagnosisTime-to-TreatmentUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdolescentAdultAgedAge FactorsColombiaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansIncidenceMiddle AgedPrevalenceRural PopulationGynecologyHealth care disparitiesNeoplasms of the cervixObstetricsSocioeconomic factorsTreatment time

Identifiers

PMID41401409
PMCPMC12140647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.