Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41401230›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Protocol for an undergraduate student-led scoping review of methods used to conduct inclusive focus groups with autistic adolescents.

Nivedita Medum, Trevor Stocker, Mary Finkler, Júlia Hellín López, Noah Edwards, Makenna Sommers, Morgan Gaston, Ella Marie Johnson, Amanda Schadler, Josh Byars and 2 more

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Nivedita MedumLyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Trevor StockerDepartment of Physiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Mary FinklerDepartment of Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Júlia Hellín LópezCollege of Natural Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Noah EdwardsLyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Makenna SommersDepartment of Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Morgan GastonDepartment of Neuroscience and Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Ella Marie JohnsonLyman Briggs College, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Amanda SchadlerDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Josh ByarsDepartment of Psychology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Julia GrieseDepartment of Statistics and Probability, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.
Celeste Campos-CastilloDepartment of Media and Information, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7376-1842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although focus groups gather early-stage input effectively, our initial literature review found few focus group studies conducted with autistic adolescents (ages 12-19), despite the potential for focus groups to provide a safe, peer-based setting that encourages autistic adolescent engagement in research. Scoping reviews of focus groups for children and people with disabilities exist, but not for autistic adolescents. We aim to fill this gap. Consequently, we plan to conduct a scoping review to identify the methods used to design inclusive focus groups for autistic adolescents. Because few relevant studies exist, we describe steps to search both academic databases and online sources (X, YouTube, Google). We detail how we will leverage our team composition, which is led by a large group of undergraduate students, some of whom are neurodiverse, to enhance the rigor and reproducibility of the scoping review. These steps include accounting for algorithms personalizing search results from online sources and the risk of encountering false information that could cause harm. We will analyze the results to show 1) the extent to which focus groups on autistic adolescents are conducted with autistic adolescents; 2) characteristics of autistic adolescents included in focus groups and underrepresented populations; 3) steps taken to design accessible focus groups for autistic adolescents; 4) which methods were feasible for and acceptable to autistic adolescents. The results of our scoping review will be an important step toward including input from autistic adolescents in the early stages of a project and, more broadly, in the research process.

Indexed as

Autistic DisorderFocus GroupsStudentsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleScoping Reviews as TopicUniversitiesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41401230
PMCPMC12707680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.