Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41401225›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

The impact of agricultural support and protection subsidy policy on grain production efficiency: A case study of China.

Yuan Tian, Yuxi Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuan TianSchool of Economics and Management, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4259-2721
Yuxi ZhouSchool of Economics and Management, Shandong Agricultural University, Taian, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Based on panel data from 31 Chinese provinces from 2012 to 2022, this study employs a difference-in-difference method to assess the impact of the agricultural support and protection subsidy (ASPS) policy on grain production efficiency. The results indicate that the ASPS policy has a significant positive impact on grain production efficiency, and the results remain robust through multiple robustness tests. Furthermore, heterogeneity analysis reveals that the policy's impact varies substantially across different regions and types of grain crops. Mechanism analysis further demonstrates that the ASPS policy enhance grain production efficiency by improving the grain cultivation areas and productive inputs. Consequently, we propose targeted policy recommendations, including enhancing the intensity and precision of subsidies, implementing differentiated subsidy approaches, and utilizing subsidies to stimulate dual efficiencies in both scale and investment.

Indexed as

AgricultureCrop ProductionCrops, AgriculturalEdible GrainChina

Identifiers

PMID41401225
PMCPMC12707636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.