ArticlePloS one2025
The role of demographic characteristics in US medical students' professional well-being and medical school experiences: An intersectional approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPrevious findings have been mixed about the role of demographic characteristics in medical students' well-being and school experiences when those characteristics were examined in isolation. The aim of this study was to investigate the roles of gender, race and ethnicity, and sexual orientation in medical students' professional well-being and medical school experiences using an intersectional approach.
methodWe analyzed data from the 2019-2022 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduation Questionnaire (N = 66,795). The independent variable was intersectional groups, composed of 16 intersectional groups that combined various genders, races and ethnicities, and sexual orientations. The outcome variables were professional well-being (i.e., burnout, career regret) and medical school experiences (i.e., general mistreatment, discrimination, emotional climate, faculty-student interaction, faculty professionalism, and satisfaction with medical education). Given the large sample, we focused on effect sizes versus statistical significance.
resultsThe intersectional groups differed from each other on all professional well-being and all medical school experience variables except emotional climate, with at least small effect sizes (ηp2 ≥ .01). Black female sexual minority students reported the most negative outcomes on all variables. The largest differences were primarily with White male heterosexual (e.g., discrimination: d = 1.68, 95% CI [1.53, 1.84]) and White female heterosexual (e.g., disengagement: d = 0.63, 95% CI [0.48, 0.79]) students. However, being a member of a greater number of marginalized groups was not necessarily associated with more negative outcomes, and patterns of group differences varied across domains of professional well-being and medical school experiences. DISCUSSION: Examining the combination of medical students' gender, race and ethnicity, and sexual orientation yielded larger and more consistent effect sizes than examining each factor individually, suggesting that an intersectional approach can identify the unique challenges confronted by medical students from specific demographic groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.