ArticlePloS one2025
SEANN: A domain-informed neural network for epidemiological insights.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In epidemiology, traditional statistical methods such as logistic regression, linear regression, and other parametric models are commonly employed to investigate associations between predictors and health outcomes. However, non-parametric machine learning techniques, such as deep neural networks (DNNs), coupled with explainable AI (XAI) tools, offer new opportunities for this task. Despite their potential, these methods face challenges due to the limited availability of high-quality, high-quantity data in this field. To address these challenges, we introduce SEANN, a novel approach for informed DNNs that leverages a prevalent form of domain-specific knowledge: Pooled Effect Sizes (PES). PESs are commonly found in published Meta-Analysis studies, in different forms, and represent a quantitative form of a scientific consensus. By integrating PES into the training loss, we demonstrate-under controlled simulations-significant improvements in predictive generalization and in the epidemiological plausibility of the learned relationships, relative to a domain-knowledge agnostic neural network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.