ArticlePloS one2025
Influence of rice variety and grain form on the development and infestation of Sitophilus oryzae (L.): A comparative analysis.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Post harvest losses caused by the rice weevil (Sitophilus oryzae L.) pose a severe threat to food security and farmer income in Ethiopia. While both rice variety and grain processing form (paddy, brown, polished) influence susceptibility, their interaction in locally adapted Ethiopian varieties remains unquantified, limiting the development of effective resistance-based storage strategies. A controlled laboratory study was conducted using a three-factor factorial experiment in a completely randomized design (CRD) with seven replicates per treatment (n = 7), totaling 126 experimental units. Six Ethiopian rice varieties (Nerica-4, Gumara, Selam, Shaga, Wanzaye, and X-Jigna) were tested across three grain forms. Each replicate consisted of 50 g of grain infested with 20 unsexed adult weevils. Key parameters measured were development time, F₁ progeny emergence (as a measure of fecundity), percentage grain damage, weight loss, and the Dobie Susceptibility Index (DI).Grain form was the dominant factor affecting weevil performance. Polished rice significantly accelerated development (mean = 29.86 days) and increased progeny production (mean = 40.38 adults) and grain damage (21.83%) compared with brown rice (29.81 progeny, 6.79-13.86% damage) and paddy rice (23.29 progeny, 8.29-16.00% damage). This represents up to a 42.3% reduction in progeny emergence and a 69.9% reduction in grain damage when storing brown rather than polished rice. A significant variety × grain form interaction (p < 0.05) revealed that polished Gumara and X-Jigna were the most susceptible combinations, while brown and paddy Nerica-4 showed the strongest resistance. The Dobie Index was strongly positively correlated with progeny count (r = 0.859, p < 0.001) and negatively correlated with development time (r = -0.912, p < 0.001), supporting its validity as a resistance metric. Grain width showed a weak but significant negative correlation with weight loss (r = -0.227, p = 0.011). The high susceptibility of polished rice and the strong resistance of Nerica-4 provide a clear strategy for loss reduction. Promoting the storage of paddy or brown rice of resistant varieties like Nerica-4 can significantly mitigate postharvest losses, reduce pesticide reliance, and enhance food security in Ethiopia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.