ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2025
Using Ambient Concentration Measurements to Quantify Volatile Organic Compound Emissions from Unconventional Oil and Gas Operations.
Article in Environmental science & technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Measuring and Modeling Air Pollution and Noise Exposure Near Unconventional Oil and Gas Development in Colorado.Research report (Health Effects Institute) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oil and gas (O&G) development in the U.S. has accelerated in the past two decades, aided by unconventional extraction techniques. Potential environmental and health impacts of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) originating from O&G activities have raised concerns, but emission estimates remain highly uncertain. This study offers new insights into operation-specific VOC emission rates during unconventional O&G development (UOGD). We utilize dispersion model simulations with a new emission inversion method to analyze four years (2019-2022) of weekly air canister samples, measuring 48 VOCs at 10 monitoring sites in Broomfield, Colorado, where several large multiwell pads were drilled, completed, and entered production during the study period. Emissions are characterized for well drilling, hydraulic fracturing, coiled tubing/millout, flowback, and production operations. Drilling using synthetic drilling muds and coiled tubing operations exhibit the highest NMVOC emission rates, with median values of 2.8 g/s and 1.1 g/s, respectively. NMVOC and benzene emission rates during flowback were 96% and 98% lower, respectively, than previously reported values, highlighting the effectiveness of improved management practices in reducing air pollutant emissions from what used to be often the most significant emission source during UOGD. Our findings provide the first report of VOC emissions from coiled tubing/millout operations and show that the EPA's nonpoint oil and gas emission estimation tool underestimates VOC emissions from drilling mud volatilization and flowback green completions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.