ArticleRadiology and oncology2025
Anlotinib monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicenter case-series analysis.
Article in Radiology and oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAnlotinib has shown encouraging therapeutic effect on various solid tumors. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of anlotinib monotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (rmNPC). PATIENTS AND
methodsThis study retrospectively included 30 patients with rmNPC, most following at least one previous line of systemic therapy. Patients underwent anlotinib monotherapy (12 or 10 mg/day). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity.
resultsThirteen patients (43.3%) had metastatic NPC, 10 (33.3%) had recurrent NPC, and 7 (23.3%) had both meta-static and recurrent NPC. Twenty-two patients (73.3%) were platinum-refractory, and 23 (76.7%) received at least three cycles of anlotinib therapy. The best overall response was partial response observed in four patients, stable disease in 18, and progressive disease in eight. The ORR was 13.3% (95% CI, 0.4-26.2%) and disease control rate was 73.3% (95% CI, 56.5-90.1%). The median OS and PFS were 11.5 months (95% CI, 7.5-15.5) and 5.7 months (95% CI, 4.7-6.7), respectively. The relatively common grade 3 or higher adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (13.3%) and oral mucositis (13.3%).
conclusionsAnlotinib monotherapy demonstrated positive efficacy in patients with rmNPC. It was well tolerated by these patients and had acceptable toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.