Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41400951›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Next-Day HIV Viral Load Test Result and Linkage to Care Among Persons Living With or at Risk of HIV: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Matthew M Hamill, M Harris Bayan, Alec Boudreau, Nisha Ramdeep, Richard Rothman, Susan H Eshleman, Tanique Bennett, Thelio Sewell, Zoe O Demko, Agha Mirza and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04793750 (Ending the HIV Epidemic Through Point-of-Care Technologies), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04793750 nacompletednot on this map

Ending the HIV Epidemic Through Point-of-Care Technologies (EHPOC): Performance Evaluation of Novel POC HIV Tests in Baltimore

TypeinterventionalSponsorJohns Hopkins UniversityRan2021 to 2025Enrolled224ConditionsHIV Infections, SyphilisArmsCepheid GeneXpert HIV-1 Qual POC HIV VL test, DPP HIV-Syphilis test system, OraQuick
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Matthew M HamillDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
M Harris BayanDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Alec BoudreauDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nisha RamdeepDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Richard RothmanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Susan H EshlemanDepartment of Pathology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Tanique BennettDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Thelio SewellDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Zoe O DemkoDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Agha MirzaDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Travis J SmallsDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Nyah JohnsonDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Benji RigganDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Elizabeth NielsenDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Robin J MacGowanCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Nathalie Gonzalez-JimenezCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Pollyanna R ChavezCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Kevin P DelaneyCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Yu-Hsiang HsiehDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Yukari C ManabeDivision of Infectious Diseases, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
Vaccine Response and Immunotherapeutics SWGP30AI094189 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Anna Palmer Durbin · 2012 to 2026
$67.0M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI094189NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: HIV viral load (VL) testing is essential for monitoring responses to antiretroviral therapy (ART) among people with HIV (PWH) and prior to the initiation of HIV preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP). In the US, the potential benefit of implementing HIV VL testing in these scenarios on linkage to care (LTC) has not been evaluated. Objectives: To investigate whether providing laboratory-based HIV VL test results changed LTC rates or time to linkage for ART or PrEP across 12 weeks. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was conducted from August 18, 2021, to February 2, 2023, with 12 weeks of follow-up. Participants were a convenience sample of adults with risk factors for HIV acquisition or PWH not taking daily ART, all of whom were recruited from an academic center emergency department in Baltimore, Maryland, and via social media advertising. Interventions: Participants were randomized 1:1 to receive a laboratory-based plasma HIV VL test with next-day results in addition to the standard of care HIV antigen/antibody test result (intervention) or to receive the standard of care HIV antigen/antibody assay alone (control). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was LTC for ART or PrEP within 12 weeks of enrollment. Secondary outcomes included time to LTC and differences in LTC by HIV status. Analyses were conducted using the intention-to-treat population. Results: Of 1105 potential participants screened, 195 (17.6%) were enrolled (median [IQR] age 36, [27-47] years; 119 [61.0%) male; 112 [57.4%] Black or African American, 51 (26.2%) White, and 32 (16.4%) other race and ethnicity; and 34 [17.4%] PWH). By week 12, 93 participants (47.7%) completed follow-up, and 69 (35.4%) were linked to care (38 of 69 [55.1%] in the intervention group vs 31 of 69 [44.9%] in the control group). Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in LTC between the intervention and control group (hazard ratio, 1.28 [95% CI, 0.80-2.05]; P = .31]). In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, time to LTC was significantly less for PWH in the intervention group (log-rank P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial assessing the effects of HIV VL test results on LTC, providing a next-day HIV VL test result did not change LTC overall. More data are required to ascertain whether a rapid point-of-care HIV VL test would improve LTC. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04793750https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04793750.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsViral LoadAdultAnti-HIV AgentsBaltimoreFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAnti-HIV Agents

Identifiers

PMID41400951
PMCPMC12709377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.