ArticleJAMA network open2025
Vaginal Estrogen Utilization Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Genitourinary Syndrome of Menopause.
Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Low-dose vaginal estrogen (VE) is a safe and effective treatment for genitourinary syndrome of menopause (GSM). The frequency of VE prescribing for GSM is unknown. Objective: To evaluate VE prescriptions among women with GSM and to identify clinical phenotypes associated with VE claims. Design, Setting, and Participants: This is a retrospective, population-based cohort study of a 20% random sample of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries enrolled in Parts A, B, and D from 2006 to 2018. Women aged 66 years and older with a diagnosis indicative of GSM were included. Exclusion criteria included diagnoses of breast and/or endometrial cancer within 6 months of GSM diagnosis. Data analysis was performed from October 2023 to June 2024. Exposure: Diagnosis indicative of GSM. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of women with a VE prescription claim (cream, ring, or tablet) during the follow-up period, from first GSM diagnosis to the end of Medicare enrollment or the study period. To quantify associations between patient characteristics and the likelihood of VE claims, univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: A total of 1 838 732 women with at least 1 GSM-related diagnosis were identified (median [IQR] age, 74 [69-81] years; median [IQR] follow-up, 8 [4-10] years). VE prescriptions were filled by 165 530 women (9.0%) at a median (IQR) of 15 (2-46) months after diagnosis. Older women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for >86 years vs 66-70 years, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.58-0.60) and those with higher Charlson Comorbidity Index scores (aOR for score ≥5 vs 0, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.66-0.69) were less likely to have a VE claim. When comparing GSM symptom groups, women with recurrent urinary tract infections were least likely to have a VE claim (aOR vs local sexual symptoms, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.46-0.64). Women with vulvovaginal symptoms (aOR, 2.70; 95% CI, 2.45-2.97) and GSM multimorbidity (aOR, 15.91; 95% CI, 14.41-17.57) were most likely to have a VE claim. Conclusions and Relevance: In this large cohort study, 9.0% of female Medicare beneficiaries with a diagnosis indicative of GSM filled a VE prescription. Younger and healthier beneficiaries and those with GSM multimorbidity were more likely to fill a VE prescription. The majority of patients with GSM symptoms, including dyspareunia, vulvovaginal atrophy, and recurrent urinary tract infections, did not fill a VE prescription. Improving patient and practitioner education, revising the diagnostic code schema to capture the full breadth of symptoms, and validating GSM clinical phenotypes will help facilitate care and enhance our understanding of symptoms in research studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.